New! June 1: Enhanced Model updated for GPTZero 4.6b and Originality 🎉

WriteHuman, a better alternative to NoteGPT

NoteGPT is an all-in-one AI assistant that generates notes, summaries, and transcripts from videos, PDFs, and audio. It bolts on a humanizer too, but in the June 2026 HumanizerBench cycle that output scored 0% as human-written across the major detectors. WriteHuman is built for one job, taking an existing AI draft and rewriting it to read as human-written, with a calibrated AI detector in the same view so you verify before you publish.

Try WriteHuman free
Trusted by 10,000,000+ writers
notegpt.io
NoteGPT's AI humanizer tool in June 2026.
writehuman.ai
The WriteHuman homepage and humanizer
VS
The data

WriteHuman vs NoteGPT: real-world performance

HumanizerBench is a public benchmark that re-tests every major AI humanizer each month. Each tool is paid for and run by hand on the same prompts, then scored against 5 major AI detectors on how human the output reads, how well it keeps the original meaning, and how cleanly it's written. Every prompt, output, and detector score is published.

Tested June 202630 samples390 tests5 AI detectors

MetricWriteHumanNoteGPT
Overall score
Composite out of 100. Weights AI-detector results 42%, meaning 32%, readability 16%, and consistency 10%, then subtracts quality penalties.
83.59
45.34
AI-detector pass rate
Share of checks where the output read as human-written, across all 5 AI detectors.
84.5%
0.0%
Meaning preserved
How closely the rewritten text keeps the original meaning.
71.8%
66.7%
Quality penalties
Points deducted from the overall score for quality issues like length inflation or meaning drift. Lower is worse.
No penalties
-2 pts
AI-detector pass rate, by detector
Share of checks on each detector where WriteHuman's output read as human-written. Showing detectors where WriteHuman scores higher.
GPTZero
78.2%
0.0%
Winston AI
84.5%
0.2%
ZeroGPT
74.3%
38.1%
Copyleaks
68.7%
3.5%
Originality.ai
46.3%
0.0%
Score by content type
Benchmark score by writing category. Showing categories where WriteHuman scores higher.
Blog posts
87.6%
0.0%
News articles
93.0%
0.1%
Marketing copy
75.7%
0.0%
Discussion posts
97.4%
0.0%

Scoring methodology ↗See the full head-to-head on HumanizerBench ↗

Proof

See the actual outputs

The scores above come from real tests, not marketing claims. Here are unedited results from the June 2026 run: the same AI-generated text, humanized by each tool, shown side by side.

Real testBlog post
Input: the AI-generated text both tools were given

10 Tips for Improving Home Wi-Fi Coverage Tired of buffering videos and dead zones in your house? You're not alone. Bad Wi-Fi is one of those modern-day frustrations that can turn a chill Netflix night into a rage-inducing nightmare. The good news? You don't need to be a tech wizard to fix it. Here are…

WriteHuman
Copyleaks100% humanMeaning kept95.4%

10 Tips for Improving Home Wi-Fi Coverage

It’s frustrating streaming videos and having dead zones in your home. Slow Wi-Fi can turn an evening watching Netflix into an evening of rage. You don’t have to be tech-savvy to solve this problem. Here are 10 ways to improve home Wi-Fi.

  1. Place Router in Home Center

Stop hiding the router in a closet. Wi-Fi signals spread in every direction. Placing the router in the center of the home gives the best spread.

  1. Elevate Router

Signals will spread further if the router is elevated. Place the router on a shelf or mount the router to the wall.

  1. Distancing Electronics

Microwaves and even baby monitors can disrupt Wi-Fi signals. Give your router more space and keep it distanced from other electronics.

  1. Updating Router Firmware

Don’t forget to log in to the router every few months to check for an update. An update can improve performance and security.

  1. Change Channel

If your neighbor’s Wi-Fi is disrupted, changing your channel will help. Most routers will allow you to change this in the admin settings. Use channels 1, 6, and 11 for a 2.4GHz.

  1. Use The 5 GHz Band.

If you use a dual-band router, you can connect to the 5 GHz band for faster speeds. Just remember that with this band, the signal won't reach as far.

  1. Add A Wi-Fi Extender or Mesh System.

If your house is big or you have a complicated layout, you might want to use a mesh Wi-Fi system (so something like Eero Wi-Fi or Google Nest Wi-Fi). They are great for eliminating dead zones in your house.

  1. Reboot Regularly.

Sometimes, as weird as it is, your router needs some sleep. You should unplug it for 30 seconds and then plug it back in. You'd be shocked at how many weird problems this fixes.

  1. Secure Your Network.

If your Wi-Fi has no password then your neighbors probably have no issues using your Wi-Fi. Make a strong password with either WPA3 or WPA2 encryption.

  1. Upgrade Your Router.

If your current router is 5 or more years old, you seriously might have to consider getting a new one. The newer routers with Wi-Fi 6 ( or 6E) are way faster and better able to handle more connections.

Using a couple of these tips will get rid of those buffering circles and you can use your Wi-Fi to its full potential.

NoteGPT
Copyleaks0% humanMeaning kept92.0%
Sick of endless buffering and Wi-Fi dead spots? You’re definitely not the only one. A lousy internet connection can turn movie night into a full-blown ordeal. But honestly, you don’t need to be some sort of IT genius to give your Wi-Fi a real boost. Here’s how you can make things better with just a few easy tweaks. 1. Put Your Router Front and Center Seriously, stop tucking your router behind the TV or in the back corner of a closet. Wi-Fi works best when the router’s out in the open, close to the middle of your house. The signals need room to spread. 2. Raise It Up Plopping your router on the floor is about as helpful as putting it in a drawer. Lift it up—shelves work, or if you’re handy, mount it on the wall. The signal likes being up high. 3. Steer Clear of Gadgets Stuff like microwaves, cordless phones, and even baby monitors can mess with your Wi-Fi. Don’t crowd your router with electronics. Give it space. 4. Update the Firmware No one loves logging into their router settings, but it’s worth it. Every few months, check if there’s an update waiting. It makes a big difference for both speed and keeping your network locked down. 5. Pick a Better Channel If you’re in an apartment or have Wi-Fi-happy neighbors, your signals might be clashing. Go into your router’s settings and switch channels. For most 2.4 GHz networks, channels 1, 6, or 11 tend to do the trick. 6. Use 5 GHz When You Can Got a dual-band router? Try connecting your phones, laptops, and streaming devices to the 5 GHz band. It’s faster—just don’t expect the same range as the slower 2.4 GHz. 7. Add a Wi-Fi Extender or Mesh System If your house is big, or shaped weird, a single router can’t always cover everything. Mesh systems like Eero or Google Nest spread out the signal, so you actually get Wi-Fi in every corner. 8. Reboot Every Now and Then Sometimes, routers just need to chill out for a sec. Unplug yours for half a minute and plug it back in—it’s the low-tech fix that often works better than you’d think. 9. Lock Down Your Network No password? Say goodbye to your bandwidth. Make sure your Wi-Fi is protected with a strong password—use WPA2 or WPA3 for extra security. 10. Don’t Cling to an Old Router Technology moves fast. If your router’s ancient (like, five years or older), it’s probably slowing everything down. Newer routers with Wi-Fi 6 (or 6E) handle way more devices and give you much better speeds. Try a couple of these and those annoying buffering circles will be history. Happy streaming!
Both tools were given the same 386-word input.
Real testBlog post
Input: the AI-generated text both tools were given

How to Publish a Self-Illustrated Picture Book: A Step-by-Step Guide Creating and publishing your own illustrated picture book is a rewarding journey that combines storytelling with visual art. Here's how to bring your project to life. ## 1. Refine Your Story First Before picking up a pencil, polish your manuscript. Picture books typically run 200–800…

WriteHuman
Winston AI100% humanMeaning kept94.5%

Another Way to Publish a Self-Illustrated Picture Book: A Step-by-Step Method

Self-illustrating a picture book is a great opportunity to combine your love of art and writing and publish a book that you can be proud of. This guide goes through some of the steps that you can take to make your book a reality.

  1. Finalize your story

It is always best to have a final draft of your story before starting to draw. Picture books generally have an average of 200-800 words and consist of 32 pages. When drafting your story, make sure to read it out loud and gather feedback from children to get a better idea of your audience. Make sure to leave gaps for illustrations to help with your story.

  1. Create a Dummy Book

To help organize your story with text and illustrations, create a dummy book. This book can have your story drawn in thumbnails to show how you want text to be placed in your picture book. This helps to figure out how text placement helps with the flow, rhythm, and suspense of your picture book.

  1. Develop your Illustrations

Use the same medium that you used for your dummy book to draft your illustrations for the book. Make sure that all of the illustrations and spreads that you draft stay consistent. Illustrations that are draft should stay at 300 DPI with an almost ½ inch bleed around the edges.

  1. Choose your Publishing Path

Traditional Publishing: If you decide you want to go the traditional publishing route for your book, you will have to do some research on the publishers and agents that accept picture book submissions. As the author and illustrator, you have an advantage since publishing houses do not have to create a complete package.

Self-Publishing: Self-publishing through means like IngramSpark, Amazon KDP, or Blurb allows you to have more ownership and more control of your money, but forces you to complete all production and marketing duties yourself.

Step 5. Make Production Files

Publishing through a traditional publisher requires understanding more of the industry and the technical side, while self-publishing helps you self-manage and learn, but still requires some technical knowledge. You will need help setting up your production files. Make sure you include bleed (0.125) and are using CMYK. Editing and proofreading can’t be skipped as it can be costly to have printing errors.

Step 6. Prepare for Production

You will want to have an active author website and social media by the time your book is up for sale. Plan in person readings and send out copies to the right reviewers. You also need to consider how the season can affect people's choice.

Step 7. Develop and Maintain a Marketing Plan

Publishing a picture book requires a lot of work and the product sometimes does not live up to the artist's expectations, but it helps develop vital skills, and seeing it in your target market's hands makes it worth it.

NoteGPT
Winston AI0% humanMeaning kept88.4%
Making your own illustrated picture book is a big project, but honestly, it’s pretty thrilling if you love drawing and writing. Here’s how you can actually see your work in print. Start with your story. Don’t touch your art supplies just yet — focus on making your manuscript as strong as possible. Picture books usually fit somewhere between 200 and 800 words and fill 32 pages, including all the boring stuff like copyright pages. Read your story out loud. Try it on kids. Cut, tweak, and polish. Let your illustrations fill in what the words don’t say. Don’t spell everything out. Next, you need a dummy book. It’s just a rough version that shows how your text and sketches flow together page-by-page. Draw super quick thumbnails for each spread. Make sure your page turns work and you’re not packing too much into one spot. This is where you’ll catch pacing problems early, before sinking hours into finished art. Now, it’s time for your illustrations. Pick a style that feels right—maybe watercolor, digital, collage, whatever speaks to you as an artist. Make two or three final sample spreads, and keep your dummy handy for reference. Stick to a consistent look, and don’t let the colors go haywire. Most publishers want high-res files (300 DPI) at the final trim size, with a little extra bleed so nothing important gets cropped. Once your art and story are ready, figure out how you want to publish. If you’re looking at traditional publishing, research agents and presses that take picture books. Being both author and illustrator is a plus—they’ll get a complete package from you. Submit your manuscript, dummy, and sample art, but follow their rules exactly or you’ll end up in the recycle bin. If you’d rather go solo, use print-on-demand platforms like IngramSpark, Amazon KDP, or Blurb. You’ll keep creative control and more money, but you handle everything: production, marketing, getting your book in stores. No matter your path, get your files ready. Learn the specs: set up pages in InDesign (or something similar), add that standard bleed (about 1/8 inch), use CMYK colors, and embed your fonts. Hire an editor and proofreader, because typos and mistakes look even worse in print. Thinking about launching? Build your website and start posting on social media months before your book’s release. Reach out to bookstores and libraries for readings, and send review copies to bloggers and big publications like Kirkus or School Library Journal. Timing matters—a lot of picture books drop in spring or fall, so plan accordingly. Once your book’s out, keep at it. Picture books live on great art and word-of-mouth. Share behind-the-scenes looks on Instagram, visit schools, put together activity sheets that teachers can actually use. Make connections with families, educators—your book needs a life beyond the launch. It takes patience and a lot of reworking, but honestly, getting your story and art into kids’ hands makes all the hours and edits worth it.
Both tools were given the same 398-word input.
Recorded start to finish

Each tool was run by hand and screen-recorded during the June 2026 run. The outputs are then scored programmatically against five major AI detectors, and every input, output, and detector score is published on GitHub. Watch the unedited humanization sessions (video opens in a new tab):

WriteHuman vs NoteGPT in 60 seconds

The headline differences. Detailed analysis below.

WriteHuman
Starting price
$18/mo Basic
Free tier
Free to use, no signup, no card
Standout
Scored 83.59 in the June 2026 HumanizerBench cycle with an 84.5% AI-detector pass rate and zero quality penalties, tested on the entry Basic plan
NoteGPT
Starting price
From $9.99/mo Pro
Free tier
Free: 15 quotas/mo, no card
Watch for
A capable all-in-one tool for generating notes, summaries, and transcripts from long videos, PDFs, and audio

Bottom line: Reach for NoteGPT to generate and summarize content from long sources. Choose WriteHuman when an existing draft has to read as human-written to detectors.

1

Different tools

NoteGPT generates content; WriteHuman rewrites it to read as human

NoteGPT is built to create. Point it at a long video, a dense PDF, or an audio file and it returns notes, a summary, or a transcript, then layers on AI chat, image generation, and voice tools. It is a productivity suite, and a capable one. People sometimes arrive at its bolt-on humanizer expecting it to take a finished AI draft and make that draft read as human-written, which is a different job entirely.

WriteHuman does only that one job. You paste an existing draft and it rewrites the structure, sentence rhythm, burstiness, transitions, and idiom, while keeping your vocabulary, citations, and quotes intact and the word count close to the original. If your goal is to generate a summary, NoteGPT is the right shelf. If your goal is writing that reads as human-written, that is what WriteHuman is engineered for.

NoteGPT
Bolt-on humanizer

Humanizing is one feature inside NoteGPT's broad productivity suite of notes, summaries, and transcripts.

WriteHuman
Purpose-built

WriteHuman does one job: take an existing AI draft and make it read as human-written.

2

Detector performance

On the one job they overlap, the gap is decisive

Both tools ship a humanizer, so HumanizerBench tested them head to head in the June 2026 cycle on 30 samples each. NoteGPT's humanized output scored a 0% AI-detector pass rate. Across the individual detectors it read as AI at GPTZero (0%), Winston AI (about 0%), Copyleaks (about 4%), and Originality.ai (0%), with ZeroGPT the only outlier near 38%.

WriteHuman posted an 84.5% pass rate in the same cycle and led on all five detectors and all four content categories. That is the difference between a tool that happens to include a humanizer and a tool whose entire reason to exist is producing writing that reads as human-written.

NoteGPT
0%

NoteGPT's humanized output scored a 0% AI-detector pass rate in the June 2026 cycle.

HumanizerBench, June 2026 cycle

WriteHuman
84.5%

WriteHuman's AI-detector pass rate in the same cycle, leading all five detectors.

3

Overall quality

Composite score and clean output, not just one metric

Detector scores are only half the story. A humanizer also has to preserve what your draft was trying to say and avoid mangling it into broken sentences. On meaning preservation, WriteHuman scored 71.8% against NoteGPT's 66.7%, and on quality penalties WriteHuman took zero while NoteGPT took two. So WriteHuman both reads as human-written more reliably and holds the meaning better.

Those pieces add up to the composite. WriteHuman finished at 83.59 out of 100, all on its entry-level Basic plan. NoteGPT finished at 45.34, a 38-point gap. When the same benchmark scores generation quality and humanization quality side by side, the specialist wins the humanization race by a wide margin.

NoteGPT
45.34

NoteGPT's composite in the June 2026 cycle, a 38-point gap behind WriteHuman.

HumanizerBench, June 2026 cycle

WriteHuman
83.59

WriteHuman's composite in the same cycle, on its entry-level Basic plan.

4

Specialist vs suite

A broad suite, asked to do a specialist's job

NoteGPT's strength is breadth. It packs notes, summaries, transcription, AI chat, and image generation into one place, and for pulling structure out of long source material that breadth is genuinely useful. Humanization is one feature among many, not the product, and the June 2026 benchmark shows the cost of that split focus: a 0% AI-detector pass rate, a -2 quality penalty, and a 45.34 composite that lands a full 38 points behind WriteHuman.

WriteHuman is the inverse. It does one job and tunes everything toward it, then ships a built-in AI detector in the same view so you can check the result before you publish. When a draft has to read as human-written to detectors like GPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, ZeroGPT, and Winston AI, a focused tool is the safer bet, and the benchmark is where that focus shows up.

NoteGPT
66.7%

NoteGPT's meaning-preservation score in the June 2026 cycle.

HumanizerBench, June 2026 cycle

WriteHuman
71.8%

WriteHuman's meaning preservation in the same cycle, with zero quality penalties.

Pricing: WriteHuman vs NoteGPT

Side-by-side plans. WriteHuman's free tier is on the homepage. No signup needed.

WriteHuman

Free

$0

Try the humanizer with daily limits, no signup

  • No credit card
  • Daily request cap
  • Built-in AI detector access

Basic

$18/mo

80 humanizations / month, up to 600 words each

  • 2 output variations
  • 160 AI detector checks / mo
  • Cancel anytime

Pro

$27/mo

200 humanizations / month, up to 1,200 words each

  • 3 output variations
  • 400 AI detector checks / mo
  • Priority support

Ultra

$48/mo

Unlimited humanizations, up to 3,000 words each

  • 5 output variations
  • Unlimited AI detector checks
  • Priority support
NoteGPT

Free

$0

15 quotas/mo across the suite, no card

Pro

$9.99/mo

1,000 basic quotas + 100 premium credits/mo

  • $9/mo if billed yearly
  • Credits cover the full NoteGPT suite, not a dedicated humanizer

Unlimited

$29/mo

Unlimited basic quotas + 2,800 credits/mo

  • $19.92/mo if billed yearly

Max

$99/mo

Unlimited basic quotas + 10,000 credits/mo

  • $69/mo if billed yearly

Pricing verified as of . For the latest NoteGPT pricing, see notegpt.io.

Feature Comparison

See how WriteHuman stacks up against NoteGPT, feature by feature.

FeatureWriteHumanNoteGPT
Purpose-built humanizer (not a bolt-on)
Output reads as human-written to GPTZero
Output reads as human-written to Originality.ai
Output reads as human-written to Copyleaks
Structural rewriting that preserves citations and quotes
Multiple output variations per request
Built-in AI detector tuned to match external tools
Free version, no signup required

What real NoteGPT users are saying

Quotes pulled from public reviews on Reddit, Trustpilot, G2, and Product Hunt.

“Don't even look at this tool if you are thinking to humanize the text.”
Neil Bannet, Trustpilot
Read full review →
“Calling this 'free' is misleading. After signing up, you're immediately asked to pay $9.”
Dheeraj Parwal, Trustpilot
Read full review →
“I paid for their "Unlimited" plan and almost immediately got hit with an "Insufficient Basic Quota" error.”
Nhân Lý, Trustpilot
Read full review →

Why writers pick WriteHuman

The everyday reasons writers switch to WriteHuman from NoteGPT.

Pick WriteHuman if…

  • You already have an AI draft and need it to read as human-written to the major detectors.
  • You are publishing professional, marketing, or client-facing content where the AI-detector score matters.
  • You want structural rewriting that keeps your vocabulary, citations, and quotes intact.
  • You want a built-in detector in the same view so you can verify before you publish.
  • You want multiple output variations per request to pick the version that best preserves your voice.

Pick NoteGPT if…

  • You want to generate notes or summaries from long videos, PDFs, or audio.
  • You need an all-in-one suite that also does transcription, AI chat, and image generation.
  • You are creating content from source material rather than rewriting an existing draft.

Why users switch from NoteGPT

Real pain points NoteGPT users run into, and how WriteHuman solves each one.

NoteGPT

Its humanizer scored a 0% AI-detector pass rate in the June 2026 HumanizerBench cycle, reading as AI to GPTZero, Winston AI, Copyleaks, and Originality.ai.

WriteHuman

WriteHuman posted an 84.5% AI-detector pass rate and led all five detectors in the same June 2026 cycle.

NoteGPT

Composite of 45.34 versus 83.59, a 38-point gap, because humanization is a side feature rather than the core product.

WriteHuman

WriteHuman scored a composite of 83.59, tested on its entry-level Basic plan.

NoteGPT

Took two quality penalties in the benchmark, where a specialist humanizer took none.

WriteHuman

WriteHuman took zero quality penalties in the benchmark, so cleaner output came with the higher pass rate.

NoteGPT

Meaning preservation of 66.7% trailed WriteHuman's 71.8%, so even the rewrite fidelity lagged.

WriteHuman

WriteHuman preserved meaning at 71.8%, keeping your vocabulary, citations, and quotes intact while it rewrites the structure.

NoteGPT

Humanization is one feature inside a broad suite, so it does not get the focused tuning a specialist tool applies to the same job.

WriteHuman

WriteHuman does one job and does it deeply, with a built-in detector in the same view so you verify before you publish.

Frequently asked: WriteHuman vs NoteGPT

Is NoteGPT a humanizer?
Not primarily. NoteGPT is an all-in-one AI productivity suite that generates notes, summaries, and transcripts from videos, PDFs, and audio. It includes a bolt-on humanizer, but in the June 2026 HumanizerBench cycle that humanizer scored a 0% AI-detector pass rate. If your main goal is writing that reads as human-written, a purpose-built NoteGPT alternative like WriteHuman is the better fit.
What is the best NoteGPT alternative for humanizing AI text?
WriteHuman is built specifically for that job. In the June 2026 HumanizerBench cycle it posted an 84.5% AI-detector pass rate and a composite of 83.59, versus NoteGPT's 45.34, all tested on WriteHuman's entry-level Basic plan.
Why does NoteGPT's humanized output still read as AI to detectors?
Humanization is a side feature in NoteGPT's broad suite, not its core focus. In the June 2026 cycle its output read as AI at GPTZero, Winston AI, Copyleaks, and Originality.ai, for a 0% AI-detector pass rate. WriteHuman rewrites at the structural level, which is what shifts how a detector scores the text.
Should I use NoteGPT or WriteHuman?
Use NoteGPT to generate notes, summaries, and transcripts from long source material. Use WriteHuman when you already have a draft that has to read as human-written. They solve different problems, and on the humanization job the benchmark gap between them is 38 composite points.
Does WriteHuman have a free tier like NoteGPT?
Yes. You can run the WriteHuman humanizer on writehuman.ai with no signup, no email, and no card, and the free experience includes built-in AI detector access. Paid plans start at $18 per month and add higher limits, more output variations, and more detector checks.

Ready to make the switch?

Join 10,000,000+ writers who trust WriteHuman to transform their AI content into polished, natural-sounding writing.

Start Free

No credit card required

This Chat Gpt is from
writehuman.visionseotools.com